Let's TalkAn account whose most attractive keywords describe conditions the board may not let you claim to treat.
Give us read access to the account. We come back with where the spend goes, which keywords produce new patients, any claims or condition terms that sit close to the scope line for your board, and the three changes worth making first. Recorded walkthrough, no call required.
Four failures we see repeatedly in this vertical, and what each one actually costs.
Searches naming conditions outside the musculoskeletal scope carry real volume and are genuinely tempting, and bidding on them puts copy in front of a searcher expecting a claim the board may not permit. This is the defining risk in a chiropractic account, and it is invisible to any agency that has not read the scope rules for the state.
A free examination or consultation is the standard chiropractic offer and it works, but several boards treat advertised free services carefully - particularly where a payer is subsequently billed for the same service, or where imaging is offered free without stating it is only taken when medically necessary. The offer is fine; the way it is advertised is what draws attention.
A cash-pay wellness patient and an insurance or personal-injury patient differ in value, decision length and what persuades them. Averaged into one campaign and one target, the account optimises toward the cheaper conversion regardless of which the practice actually wants more of - and most practices have a clear preference they never expressed to the account.
Chiropractic economics depend on a course of care rather than a single appointment, so a campaign producing many first visits that do not convert into plans looks excellent and produces little. Without plan acceptance fed back, bidding optimises toward the cheapest possible initial appointment, which is frequently the least likely to continue.
Business outcomes rather than dashboard metrics. None of these is a guaranteed number - where we do guarantee something, it is written into the offer above.
The real deliverables, not a list written to make a proposal look thicker.
Not the general agency pitch. The reasons that only apply to this kind of business.
The most attractive condition keywords in this category are the ones closest to a line the board draws, and the rule reaches an agency acting for a licensee as well as the licensee. Most chiropractic accounts have never had that review, which means the exposure exists and nobody has looked at it.
The offer is standard and it works. How it is advertised is what attracts board attention, particularly around billing a payer for a service advertised as free and around imaging offered without a medical-necessity qualifier. Adjusting the wording costs a little conversion and removes the part that creates the risk.
Counting first visits produces more first visits, and a meaningful share never become a course of care. Feeding plan acceptance back changes what the algorithm chases and typically reduces the reported conversion count while raising revenue - the same uncomfortable trade we make in every category where the first appointment is not the sale.
Condition terms assessed for the board that governs the practice, before any budget reaches them.
Cash-pay, insurance and personal-injury intent given their own campaigns, targets and pages.
Wording that keeps the conversion and removes the part boards take an interest in.
Plan acceptance imported so bidding stops optimising toward the cheapest first visit.
Pages per condition group that stay inside what the board permits a licensee to claim.
Negatives monthly; reporting to plan acceptance and revenue rather than to appointment counts.
The parts of this that come from having run it in this industry before rather than from running it well in general.
Chiropractic advertising rules reach an agency acting for a licensee, and the highest-volume keywords sit nearest the boundary. An account built without that review is carrying a risk the practice owns and cannot see, and reviewing it is cheap compared with a complaint.
Accident patients arrive through a different search, convert on a different timeline, and in some markets involve referral arrangements with their own legal considerations. Mixed into a wellness campaign the economics are unreadable and both halves are mismanaged.
The practice runs on courses of care, not on first appointments, and the gap between the two varies enormously by campaign. Measuring plan acceptance per campaign is the most informative report available here and almost nobody builds it.
Keyword research will suggest content the board may not permit a licensee to claim. Writing condition pages inside scope means declining some genuinely high-volume topics, which is a content decision made for compliance reasons rather than editorial ones.
The closest engagement we can point at is a multi-state clinic network rather than a chiropractic practice, and we will not dress it up. Its relevance is scaling acquisition in a regulated health category while lead quality held - 54,000+ leads, cost per lead down 57%. The scope-of-practice work on this page is specific to chiropractic and comes from reading the board rules rather than from that engagement.
Read the full case studyIt depends on the condition and on your board, and it is the central question in a chiropractic account. Advertising that indicates services outside the scope of practice is restricted, and several of the highest-volume condition searches sit near that line. Take the specifics to your own advice - what we do is establish where the line is for your state before any budget goes near those keywords.
The offer generally is not; how it is advertised can be. Boards have taken positions on advertising a service as free while billing a payer a higher charge for that same service, and on free imaging advertised without stating it is taken only when medically necessary. Adjusting the wording keeps most of the conversion and removes the part that attracts attention.
Separate campaigns, separate pages and separate targets, because they are different searches with different expectations. Run together, the account optimises toward whichever converts more cheaply, which is rarely the mix the practice actually wants. Stating the preference to the account structure is the whole fix and most practices never have.
Almost always because the account is buying first visits that do not become care plans. Chiropractic runs on a course of care and a single appointment is worth very little, so optimising to appointment volume finds the cheapest possible initial visits - which are also the least likely to continue. Feeding plan acceptance back changes what the algorithm looks for.
Where available, usually worth testing alongside search rather than instead of it. They charge per lead and carry a verification badge that does real work for a patient choosing a practitioner they have not met. They give you little control over messaging, which matters more here than in most categories because of the scope constraints on what may be claimed.
The licensee carries it in practice, which is why we treat prevention as our job. Chiropractic advertising rules reach a licensee's employee or agent, so an agency writing copy is inside the rule rather than outside it - but the consequence lands on your licence. That is an argument for the review happening before production rather than after a complaint.
This is one part of a bigger service. Here is the whole of it, and the closest neighbours.
No pitch deck, no discovery call you have to sit through. Tell us the situation and we will tell you whether we can help.