Platino SolLet's Talk
Roofing Marketing

Marketing for Roofing Companies

A trade where one storm can supply a year of work, and where the competition arrives in a truck before your ad does.

The no-brainer offer

A free audit of your roofing lead flow, with the unqualified share costed.

Give us access to the ad account and a list of the last hundred leads with what happened to each. We will come back with what proportion were renters, out-of-area, repair-only or never reachable, what that cost you, and which campaigns produced the estimates that actually got signed. Recorded walkthrough, no call required.

The audit is free and yours to act on however you like, with or without us.
84+
Brands scaled
5
Ad platforms run in-house
7
Countries reached
9+
Years combined experience
Why this is hard

What usually goes wrong in roofing marketing

Four failures we see repeatedly in this vertical, and what each one actually costs.

Storm demand arrives faster than any campaign can be built

A hailstorm creates a fortnight of concentrated, high-intent demand in a defined geographic footprint, and most contractors start thinking about advertising after it has passed. The businesses that capture it have the campaigns, the creative and the geography ready to switch on within hours. Building from scratch after the weather means competing for the leftovers at the highest prices of the year.

The insurance claim is the real buying process and the marketing ignores it

A large share of replacement work is paid by an insurer, which makes the homeowner's actual question not "which roofer is best" but "who will handle the claim without me having to understand it". Marketing that leads with materials, warranties and crew photos answers a question that buyer is not asking, while a competitor explaining the claims process gets the call.

Half the leads cannot buy a roof

Renters, people who need a repair rather than a replacement, and homeowners outside the area you will travel to. They all fill in the same form and all appear in the same lead count, and without qualification in the funnel the reported cost per lead looks healthy while the cost per signed job quietly doubles.

Estimates are booked and then nobody is home

A roofing estimate costs a crew slot and a drive, and no-shows come straight off the margin. The cause is usually upstream: a lead captured with no commitment, no confirmation sequence, and days between the enquiry and the visit. Campaign reporting counts that as a converted lead and the business counts it as a wasted morning.

What changes

What this is supposed to produce

Business outcomes rather than dashboard metrics. None of these is a guaranteed number - where we do guarantee something, it is written into the offer above.

Storm response measured in hours rather than weeks. Campaigns, creative and geographic targeting prepared in advance so a weather event is a switch rather than a project.
Fewer estimates, more of them signed. Qualification moves into the funnel, so the crew's time goes to homeowners who can actually buy a roof.
The insurance-claim buyer gets their own answer. A funnel that addresses the claims process directly, which is the question that buyer is actually weighing.
No-show rate stops eating the margin. Confirmation and reminder sequences between booking and visit, measured as a number rather than assumed.
Spend follows signed jobs. Reporting reconciles to contracts rather than to form fills, which usually reorders the campaign ranking immediately.
What you get

What the work actually involves

The real deliverables, not a list written to make a proposal look thicker.

Storm-response campaigns built in advance and held ready, with geographic targeting by damage footprint
Separate funnels for insurance-claim replacements and for homeowner-paid work
Lead qualification in the form and in the follow-up, so renters and repairs are filtered early
Estimate confirmation and reminder sequences to cut no-shows
Call tracking with recordings, reconciled to signed contracts rather than to leads
Google Business Profile and review work, since roofing is chosen on trust before price
Landing pages built around the claims process, not around shingle brands
Monthly reporting that ties spend to contracts and to average job value
Why us

Why bring us in for roofing marketing specifically

Not the general agency pitch. The reasons that only apply to this kind of business.

We build the storm campaign before the storm

The work that captures a hail event is preparation, not reaction: campaigns paused and ready, creative approved, geography drawn, budget reserved. That is unbillable work in the months when nothing is happening, which is exactly why most agencies do not do it and why it is the single biggest difference in this trade.

We count signed contracts, not estimates booked

An estimate is a cost to you and a conversion to most reporting tools, which puts the agency's number and your P&L in opposition. We reconcile to signed jobs and average job value, so the campaigns that produce cheap estimates nobody signs get defunded rather than celebrated.

We will say when the lead problem is a qualification problem

Roofing accounts are frequently not underperforming on traffic at all - they are buying the wrong homeowners efficiently. Fixing that reduces lead volume, which looks like a worse month on every chart an agency normally shows you. We would rather have that conversation than quietly keep the volume number high.

How it runs

The first ninety days, in order

  1. Audit the lead list, not the ad account

    The last hundred leads and what happened to each. The wasted share in this trade is usually visible in twenty minutes and invisible in the platform reporting.

  2. Split claim work from cash work

    Two buyers, two anxieties, two funnels. The insurance buyer wants the process handled; the cash buyer wants price and durability.

  3. Put qualification in front of the estimate

    Ownership, roof age, repair versus replacement, location. Asked in the funnel rather than discovered on the driveway.

  4. Prepare the storm playbook

    Campaigns, creative and geography built and paused, with a budget reserve. When the weather arrives the work is switching it on, not building it.

  5. Close the loop to contracts

    Call tracking and CRM reconciliation so reporting shows signed jobs and average value, which is the ranking budget should follow.

  6. Review after every event and every quarter

    Storm months and normal months are judged separately. Blending them produces an average that describes neither and hides both.

Built for this

What a generalist engagement would miss

The parts of this that come from having run it in this industry before rather than from running it well in general.

Geography is drawn around damage, not around a radius

Storm demand follows a track, and that track rarely matches a circle around your yard. Targeting built on the actual affected footprint reaches homeowners who have a reason to call this week, while a standing radius spends the same money reaching people whose roofs are fine.

The claims conversation is treated as marketing content

Deductibles, adjuster visits, supplements, what a homeowner should not sign - this is the material a claim-funded buyer is searching for, and almost nobody publishes it properly. It ranks, it earns links, and it arrives with the buyer already trusting whoever explained it.

Seasonality and weather are separate variables

Roofing has a predictable annual curve and an unpredictable event curve on top of it, and treating them as one number produces budgets that are wrong in both directions. Planning the baseline separately from the reserve is what keeps a storm month from consuming the year's spend.

Reviews are load-bearing in a trade with a trust problem

Roofing carries more consumer suspicion than most trades, much of it earned by transient operators after storms. Review volume, recency and how complaints are answered do more work here than in any other trade we handle, and they are cheaper to improve than the ad account.

Proof

A client in this exact position

3 Locations to a Full Regional Network in 14 Months

Dental Network Regional Expansion

Our nearest comparable engagement is a multi-location service business rather than a roofing contractor, and we will not imply otherwise. What transfers is the part this trade usually gets wrong: the gap between a booked appointment and an attended one. Show-rate rose 44% across that network and cost per lead fell to $19, and the show-rate half came entirely from what happened between the enquiry and the visit - which is the same gap a roofing estimate falls into.

Read the full case study
LEADS
31,000+
COST PER LEAD
$19
SHOW RATE LIFT
44%
REVENUE GROWTH
9x
Questions

Before you ask us

By building the campaign before it happens and leaving it paused. Storm demand is concentrated into days, and the contractors who capture it are the ones who can switch on prepared campaigns with prepared creative and redraw the geography in an afternoon. The unpredictable part is when; the preparable part is everything else, and it is where almost all of the advantage sits.

Related

Where this sits

This is one part of a bigger service. Here is the whole of it, and the closest neighbours.

Part of our
Performance Marketing & Media Buying
Get started

Tell us where you are

No pitch deck, no discovery call you have to sit through. Tell us the situation and we will tell you whether we can help.

  • A reply within one business day, from someone who would work on the account
  • No pitch deck and no pressure - we will tell you if you are not a fit
  • Everything we produce during the offer is yours to keep either way