Let's TalkLet's TalkGeneral contractors do not need more leads. They need fewer, better ones - qualified before anyone estimates, nurtured through a long decision, and fed by referral partners as well as ads.
Share last year's enquiries and what became of them. We trace each to its source, show which sources produced signed projects and which produced estimating work for nothing, and map how your referral partners actually perform. Recorded walkthrough, no call required.
Four failures we see repeatedly in this vertical, and what each one actually costs.
A general contractor can have a busy inbox and an empty pipeline. Enquiries for small jobs, projects years away and budgets that will never meet the work all count as leads, and each one takes a call to understand. Measuring lead volume rewards exactly the sources that waste the most time.
Many home-improvement lead platforms send the same enquiry to several contractors at once. That suits the homeowner and the platform; for the contractor it means racing to call first and competing on price for a project where trust should decide. Some contractors win there, but few build a business on it.
A major renovation or addition is decided over months, often waiting on finance, plans or a partner. Contractors who call twice and move on lose most of the projects that eventually sign - to whoever kept sending useful updates.
The architect who sent two great projects last year hears nothing until the next time they think of you. Referral relationships fade quietly, and because nobody tracks them, nobody notices the pipeline thinning until it has.
Business outcomes rather than dashboard metrics. None of these is a guaranteed number - where we do guarantee something, it is written into the offer above.
The real deliverables, not a list written to make a proposal look thicker.
Not the general agency pitch. The reasons that only apply to this kind of business.
A contractor's lead report should end in signed contracts, not lead counts. We trace every enquiry to an outcome and rank sources by what they produce, so the channel that sends fewer but better enquiries gets the credit - and the budget - it deserves.
Most large projects are not signed in the first fortnight. We set up follow-up that stays useful for months - recent projects, how your process works, when crews have availability - so the client waiting on a bank or an architect still thinks of you first when they are ready.
Architects, designers, realtors and past clients are often a general contractor's best lead source and least managed one. We create a light, regular programme to keep those relationships warm and track what each partner sends, so the pipeline does not depend on someone remembering to call.
Last year's enquiries followed to outcomes and ranked by signed projects.
Scope, budget, timeline and plans, asked consistently everywhere.
Which enquiries get a full estimate, and which a polite referral on.
A months-long sequence of useful contact for open projects.
Regular contact with partners and past clients, tracked by results.
Monthly cost per signed project, with budget moved accordingly.
The parts of this that come from having run it in this industry before rather than from running it well in general.
Estimating a large project takes skilled hours. Qualifying on scope, budget and timeline before estimating means those hours go to projects that can proceed, which matters more to a general contractor's margin than any reduction in cost per lead.
A project arriving through an architect usually has drawings, a budget conversation behind it and a client who has committed to building. Those partners are worth more attention than almost any ad channel - and they respond to reliability and communication.
A client whose project went well knows other people planning work. A light programme of contact - a project anniversary note, a seasonal update - keeps you in mind for their next project and their friends' first one.
Lead platforms can fill gaps, but enquiries sent to several contractors become price contests. Judging them on cost per signed project alongside your own channels shows whether they deserve budget, and usually argues for building your own pipeline.
None of our case studies is a construction business. The nearest is a luxury real estate engagement where we built a funnel that qualified every enquiry before a call was booked - 312 booked calls from 1,900+ qualified leads at $41 each, a 19x return across the pipeline. Qualifying high-value enquiries before anyone's time is spent is exactly the discipline a general contractor's pipeline needs.
Read the full case studyOften referrals from architects, designers, realtors and past clients, followed by your own search and local presence. The right answer for your business comes from tracing last year's signed projects to their real sources, which is where we start.
Sometimes, to fill gaps. Shared leads sent to several contractors become price contests, so judge them on cost per signed project alongside your own channels. Most contractors do better building their own pipeline and using platforms sparingly.
Ask project type, scope, budget band, timeline, and whether plans or an architect are involved - consistently, on every channel. Then agree a rule with your team for which enquiries get a full estimate.
For as long as the decision takes - often months. Useful updates about recent projects, process and availability keep you in mind while the client waits on finance, plans or a partner.
Be reliable, communicate well on their projects, and stay in touch between them: project updates, a quick note when you have availability, an easy way to refer. Track what each partner sends so the relationship is managed, not left to chance.
By cost per signed project and estimating time per signed project, by source. Lead volume and cost per lead reward the sources that waste the most time in this trade.
Yes - through repeat work and introductions to friends and neighbours planning their own projects. A light, regular programme of contact keeps you the first name they mention.
Yes, as a band rather than an exact figure, with a 'not sure yet' option. It is the single most useful qualifying question for large projects, and clients planning seriously usually have a range in mind. Those who will give no indication at all are often the least likely to proceed.
Thank them, confirm what they asked about and give a clear next step - usually a short call to understand scope, budget and timing before any site visit. A fast, specific reply sets the tone for how you will communicate during the project, which is exactly what clients are judging.
A few useful contacts a year: a note on the anniversary of their project, a seasonal maintenance tip, a recent project they might like. Personal and occasional beats frequent and promotional, and it keeps you the first name they mention when a friend asks for a builder.
Written for owners weighing this up, whether or not they work with us.
This is one part of a bigger service. Here is the whole of it, and the closest neighbours.
No pitch deck, no discovery call you have to sit through. Tell us the situation and we will tell you whether we can help.